There some things in this world that can leave me speechless with rage or helplessly drowning in my own annoyance. These include reality TV shows, Catherine Tate, fashion nazis and people being unnecessarily rude.
However in this post, I want to vent my spleen at the truly hideous publication that is Didsbury Magazine. It is the free glossy magazine that is shoved through our doors once a month. I am aware that Didsbury is a fairly affluent area (although, I myself am far from affluent), but Didsbury Magazine is the most offensively capitalist, middle class toilet rag I have ever had the misfortune to set my eyes upon.
Here's how it describes itself on its website:
"Didsbury Magazine is the glossy lifestyle magazine for the style concious (sic) citizens of Didsbury and South Manchester"
Arrrrgh, I'm already furious, just reading that description (let alone the bloody spelling mistake). It is full of toothily perfect rich people talking about how marvellous their lives are. It tells you the best places for 'ladies who lunch' (there is genuinely an article using that term in the latest edition. I'm not joking - 'Ladies who Lunch'! for f*@k's sake...). It completely ignores the fact that its coverage area includes some estates like Merseybank & Nell Lane where the daily problem of which £50 moisturiser to use or what to do with your seed heads is not really an issue.
Now we get to the point that had me speechless with rage. In July, Didsbury Magazine had a fund-raising ball. It was 007 themed and was attended by lots of people and lots of local companies donated prizes. Now, I am the first to applaud the wealthy putting their hands in their pockets to help those less well off. If you follow this link you can see photos from the big night. How much money do you think all those exceedingly well dressed, well troughed people raised on the night?
£1000......
Lets just think about that shall we? At first glance, that sounds like a lot of money. Until you think how many people were there, how much the whole thing will have cost to put together. Then suddenly £1000 seems like an insultingly small amount. I remember a youth group I was involved with that only had about 10 members who managed to raise over £500 pounds for charity.
How dare this vile publication brag about raising what is, frankly, pocket change? If they'd got their guests to put in £20 a piece and saved the money from the event, they'd probably have raised double the money. It seems to me that the evening was a chance for wannabe WAGs and Sloane Rangers to get pissed out their tree and show off their impressive wealth while feeling they were "making a difference."
Or maybe I'm completely wrong about the whole thing. But hey, that's what blogs are for, venting spleen. I feel much better now....
By the way, you may be asking yourself: "If he hates the magazine so much, why does he read it?" That is an excellent question, well done for asking it. I read it because I like to get cross about things from time to time....
8 comments:
Just because you live in grotty West Didsbury near the poor people.
Must go, I need to get my frilly dress ready for lunch tomorrow.
I would have thought you would always have a frilly dress ready to go at a moment's notice...
If I had access to photoshp I'd provide proof.
Any idea why blogger has decided I suddenly need to read some things in German? For example, below this comment box, I've got "Sie können HTML-Tags verwenden, z. B.*"
Very odd.
*There wre the usual letters in tags but I had to delete them as I couldn't post due to dodgy html...
Hang on, Can Manchester and style conscious be used in the same sentence.
Glossy magazines packed with irony-free 'ladies who lunch' articles in the face of howling poverty, with the scrappy figleaf of 'charity' to fend off criticism? Come to Bangkok. You'll puke your guts out.
Welcome merlin. Well, as the magazine used the word 'concious' probably not....
Is that an open invitation Tim?
My area has a similar magazine. They are a nauseating waste of paper.
I wonder about the people who write those articles. Are they seriously interested in Ladies Who Lunch finding places to dine, or are they just being typewriter monkeys to the advertisers?
I'm not sure you really do wonder. I suspect you already know the answer..
Post a Comment